git.openstack.orgOpenDev: Free Software Needs Free Tools
git.openstack.org Profile
git.openstack.org
Maindomain:openstack.org
Title:OpenDev: Free Software Needs Free Tools
Description:Gitea (Git with a cup of tea) is a painless self-hosted Git service written in Go
Keywords:go,git,self-hosted,gitea...
Discover git.openstack.org website stats, rating, details and status online.Use our online tools to find owner and admin contact info. Find out where is server located.Read and write reviews or vote to improve it ranking. Check alliedvsaxis duplicates with related css, domain relations, most used words, social networks references. Go to regular site
git.openstack.org Information
Website / Domain: |
git.openstack.org |
HomePage size: | 18.898 KB |
Page Load Time: | 0.28858 Seconds |
Website IP Address: |
23.253.245.150 |
Isp Server: |
Rackspace Cloud Servers |
git.openstack.org Ip Information
Ip Country: |
United States |
City Name: |
San Antonio |
Latitude: |
29.499677658081 |
Longitude: |
-98.39924621582 |
git.openstack.org Keywords accounting
Keyword |
Count |
go | 3 |
git | 14 |
self-hosted | 0 |
gitea | 1 |
git.openstack.org Httpheader
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 00:32:13 GMT |
Server: Apache/2.4.29 (Ubuntu) |
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 |
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN |
Set-Cookie: lang=en-US; Path=/; Max-Age=2147483647; HttpOnly, i_like_gitea=84da1b3879bce2f6; Path=/; HttpOnly, _csrf=DHzuQcD09qNW4qkqmWfzz9QHCRI6MTYxOTEzNzkzMzQwMzU0MTcxOQ; Path=/; Expires=Sat, 24 Apr 2021 00:32:13 GMT; HttpOnly |
Vary: Accept-Encoding |
Content-Encoding: gzip |
Content-Length: 6706 |
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=100 |
Connection: Keep-Alive |
git.openstack.org Meta Info
23.253.245.150 Domains
git.openstack.org Similar Website
Domain |
WebSite Title |
git.openstack.org | OpenDev: Free Software Needs Free Tools |
free-download.software.informer.com | Free Download Software Informer: Free download, free test, and your first real ringtone is free! On |
sourceware.org | sourceware.org: Free software! Get your fresh hot free software! |
biking.hairsonfire.com | Riding with Heyoka | Let me be a free man – free to travel, free to stop, free to work. Chief Josep |
shuriksoft.com | Tucows Software Library Free Software Free Download |
my.fsf.org | Welcome to a society for free software advocates, supporting the ethical cause of computer user free |
crm.fsf.org | Welcome to a society for free software advocates, supporting the ethical cause of computer user free |
apponic.com | Free Downloads - Discover and Download BEST, FREE Software, Apps, and Games |
tvshqipkscom.media-toolbar.com | Free Media Recorder Toolbar - Free download and software |
liveinternetstreamtv.media-toolbar.com | Free Media Recorder Toolbar - Free download and software |
fr.all-free-download.com | Free Vector graphic art free photos free icons free |
free.premierbiosoft.com | Free Molecular Biology Software, Free Tools for Biologists, Molecular Biology Glossary, Free Primer |
tracker-software.com | Tracker Software Products :: PDF Creation Software, Free PDF Editor, FREE OCR, Voted Best PDF Reader |
all-free-download.com | Free Vector graphic art, free photos, free icons, free website templates, psd graphic, photoshop br |
e-tarocchi.com | Free Tarot Readings, Free Astrology Reports, Free Numerology Reports, Free Rune Casts |
git.openstack.org Traffic Sources Chart
git.openstack.org Alexa Rank History Chart
git.openstack.org Html To Plain Text
This website works better with JavaScript. Home Explore Get Started Code hosting Code review Continuous integration Collaborative editing What is OpenDev? OpenDev is a collaboratory for open source software development at scale. Its focus is on code review, continuous integration, and project hosting provided exclusively through open source solutions like Git, Gerrit, Zuul, and Gitea. It also provides a number of peripheral collaboration services (like Mailman mailing lists, IRC bots for notifications and annotating text-based meetings, Jitsi-Meet for videoconference discussions integrated with Etherpad for collective text editing). All of these services are openly operated by the community, and continuously integrated and deployed using OpenDev itself. How is development different with OpenDev OpenDev doesn't use a pull request (or merge request) workflow, like those implemented by GitHub or Gitlab. Instead it follows Gerrit's iterative change proposal workflow, which results in a slightly different experience. In GitHub or Gitlab, contribution typically starts by forking a personal copy of the original repository, cloning that locally, and pushing one or more commits to that personal fork. Once your code seems ready to merge, you ask the service to create a pull request for your branch into the original repository. The pull request is reviewed, and if accepted your changes get merged into the original repository. If not, you push more commits to your fork and update the request seeking more reviews. By contrast, contribution with Gerrit starts by cloning the original repository locally. You iterate on development of one or more local commits, and then use git push (or the git-review tool) to propose your commits as a series of changes to the Gerrit code review service. Each change in the series is reviewed, and if it's accepted (and passing tests) then it gets merged into the original repository. If more work is needed, you amend the same commits and push new versions of them for re-review. The difference is subtle, but significant. In the pull request model, you create a fork of the original repository, push changes to it, and ultimately propose to merge changes back. In the change proposal model, you prepare a change, and propose it. You do not create a complete fork and everyone contributes into the same original repository with what are basically lightweight, ephemeral topic branches. It results in less fragmentation overall, and avoids confusion between the original repository and its numerous forks. That high-level difference also affects lower-level details. A pull request may contain several commits, and if merged all those commits will appear in the original repository history. In Gerrit, every commit is a separate change (optionally depending on other related changes) for code reviewers to review, so developers squash or amend edits made while developing to represent the desired final state of that change. Each prior revision of a change is still retained by the service, as are all the review comments, so updates can be compared side-by-side for a clear picture of how the change evolved. It generally results in easier code review, but also a cleaner branch history with the commit messages reviewed as an integral part of each change. In summary, the Gerrit workflow, its user experience and UI are different from the pull request workflow. While it may not be immediately familiar to developers used to pull request workflows, it's worth learning. Long-term benefits outweigh the short-term cost of having to learn a new tool, especially for someone who is going to spend a lot of time developing for that project anyway. Integrated Continuous Integration One key benefit of OpenDev is that it integrates powerful continuous integration features, made possible by the donation of compute resources from our generous infrastructure partners. Test jobs are run when changes are proposed and provide code reviewers with valuable information. Test jobs also run again at merge time, in case recently approved changes introduce an incompatibility, preventing code which doesn't pass tests from merging to the repository. Advanced Zuul features like speculative execution of tests allow the testing of sequenced changes in parallel, so development velocity is rarely limited by how thorough you want your tests to be. Changes in one Git repository can depend on proposed changes in another repository, allowing integration testing of features actively developed across multiple projects, removing artificial barriers between development teams. This advanced continuous integration system was developed to sustain the complexity and scale of OpenStack development, one of the three most actively developed open source projects in the world. OpenDev makes this system available to other projects, enabling open development at scale for everyone. Free software needs free tools Finally, another key difference between OpenDev and other development infrastructure services like GitHub or Gitlab.com is that it's built purely using open source software. GitHub and Gitlab.com are provided free of charge for open source projects, but they are both implemented using proprietary code. If development of your free and open source software requires interaction with proprietary code, is it truly free (as in freedom)? It is widely accepted today that using open source technology reduces your reliance on outside parties and enables innovation. It should be obvious that developing software by using open source toolchains has the same effect. Nothing prevents a service provider from changing its terms of service, creating new limitations, blocking access for contributors connecting from specific countries, or even fully removing your project. Proprietary development services create the same form of hard limits, lock-in and dependency that proprietary software does, and prevent open innovation in the development infrastructure space. OpenDev is entirely built using open source software, but goes one step beyond: it is also openly operated. Even its operation tooling and configuration is open source, lives in Git, and is continuously-deployed. It serves as a clear example of transparent collaboration for systems administration. Like free and open source software, it requires engaging with its community to get the most of it -- OpenDev is not a service you consume, it's a community you join. That can be a bit overwhelming if you just want to focus on development, especially when ready-to-consume services are available. But it's worth it, especially if you want to have a say in what services are provided, or just support the idea of improving open source tools in that space. FAQ Isn’t this just OpenStack Infrastructure rebranded? It is more than that. We want to make this toolset available to others that would find it helpful. OpenStack is one of the OpenDev tenants, but other tenants like Zuul or $gizmo would be just as important. Can I host my project on OpenDev? Yes! However, as noted above it is still early days yet and the early experience might be a bit bumpy. Certain things may still say “OpenStack” on them as we figure out the transition. And while any moves should come with appropriate redirects, we may have some inadvertent misses. Can I run tests on Windows or OSX machines? Currently all of our test resources are Linux based. Adding additional platforms would likely require someone to help us get that running, but Zuul will support systems with ansible connection plugins. Talk to us! I am an existing OpenStack Infra user do I need to do anything? No. We’ll continue to communicate changes as they happen. We’ll also do our best to make this as smooth a transition as possible. If we run into situations that force us to break something we’ll be sure to let you know at that point. Is a CLA required for hosted repos? No. What if I don’t like Gerrit and would prefer (insert tool here)? We’ve got...